Human Relations - Conflict Resolution - Heitler Essay

Human Relations - Conflict Resolution - Heitler - Essay Example This book is principally for advisors, who manage various kinds of contentions in human relations. The principle thought of this book centers around thorough and integrative viewpoint about human brain research. Heitler brings up that passionate pressure prompts struggle. In this way, the most ideal approach to determine struggle is to recognize the purpose for enthusiastic pressure and to take healing measures to maintain a strategic distance from it in future. The plan to break down clash among couples and techniques to help them intends to determine clashes in family settings. Creator makes an immaterial differentiation among concerns and arrangements on compromise. It manages differing speculations on character, psychotherapy, connections and gives obvious rules to handle issues looked in remedial practice. Note that this work manages the mix of framework viewpoints, intellectual and social strategies and customary perspectives on character and treatment. The creator gives specif ic consideration to critical thinking techniques and systems, which are extremely important in family settings and remedially compelling. Another significant point is the five fundamental clash techniques: battle, submit, freeze, escape, and critical thinking which assesses canine conduct, its human comparable and its passionate outcomes. It gives specific consideration to compromise and is extremely important for an advisor to analyze the issue and to a person to understand his/her self. The creator watches the significance of compromise between couples. It demands couples to concentrate on the explanation for struggle. For example, on the off chance that one spotlights on compromise, the purpose for it might be disregarded. The majority of the advisors and scholars focus on compromise, not on its motivation. Creator calls attention to this issue and focuses on the passionate worry behind each contention. The most helpful procedure talked about is the

Evils of Monarchy and Society in the Works of Mark Twain Essay

The Evils of Monarchy and Society in the Works of Mark Twain   â â In the last piece of his life, Mark Twain built up a profound pull scorn for society.â His sayings regularly mirror this hatred: Each one is a moon and has a clouded side which he shows to nobody (Salwen n.pag.).â This contempt for mankind in the end situated itself in complete objection for what he called the doomed human race.â Twain's analysis for society showed up in a significant number of his works, becoming more grounded and more grounded as time passed.â Hand close by with his abhorrence for society went his disdain for the upper class.â In every one of his works, Twain makes a topic of appearance versus reality and eventually draws out his brutal analysis of governments.  Through such imperial analysis, Twain remarks on American progress, assaults society's goals, and attacks accepted ways of thinking.   â â The Prince and the Pauper has regularly been discounted as simply one more youngsters' book.â It is viewed as Twain's first involvement in recorded fiction, which just drove into Twain's increasingly renowned work, A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court.â However, Twain begins to show his objection to governments in this book.â Edward, the Prince of England, and a typical bum kid, Tom Canty, switch garments and characters, tossing each into a social circumstance with which he isn't familiar.â Through the narratives of every kid, Twain brings out two topics that mirror his perspectives on government and society.â Underlying the undertakings of Tom Canty is Twain's joke of the possibility that garments decide a man's place in society.â As Twain once stated, Garments make the man. Stripped individuals have practically no impact in the public eye (Clothes n.pag.).â Tom Canty accept the job of King of Engl... ...n.â Boston: Twayne, 1988. Lynn, Kenneth S.â Afterword to The Prince and the Pauper. Imprint Twain Quotations - Clothes.â [Online] Available: <http://www.tarleton.edu/~schmidt/Clothes.html> (May 22, 1999) Imprint Twain Quotations - Monarchy.â [Online] Available: <http://www.tarleton.edu/~schmidt/Monarchy.html> (May 22, 1999) Salomon, Roger. B.â Twain and the Image of History.â Yale University, 1961.  Rpt. in Twentieth-Century Literary Criticism, Vol. 48.â Detroit: Gale,  1993. Salwen, Peter.â The Quotable Mark Twain.â [Online] Available:  <http://salwen.com/mtquotes.html> (May 4, 1999) Twain, Mark.â The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.â Tom Doherty, 1985. _____.â A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court.â New York: Penguin. _____.â The Prince and the Pauper.â New York: Penguin, 1964.

A Very UnSerious Reader, Indeed

A Very UnSerious Reader, Indeed I feel like this phrase serious reader has been thrown around a lot lately. Of course, we all know Jonathan Franzen wants us to understand that serious readers should only want paper books (and especially his paper books), which seemed to kick the term serious reader into high gear. We employ the phrase  serious reader here at BookRiot pretty often, I guess to distinguish from silly readers. (Jeff once used the phrase twice in the first sentence of a post.) It seems to be a phrase designed to create community around people who like a certain kind of book and treat reading in a certain kind of way: people who take reading seriously, I suppose. The phrase serious reader gives me hives. But maybe thats because Ive been hearing that phrase a lot for most of my scholarly  life. It usually precedes a dismissal of something people like. Im a serious reader, so I dont typically read comic books / romance / sci-fi / YA / bestsellers. Those people really do italic that shit with their voices, too. Theyd fake a British accent if they thought they could get away with it. In that context, the term serious reader drips with disdain. Serious readers also dont own television sets but have to tell you all the time about how they dont own television sets; they seem to sit around waiting for a TV show to come up in conversation just so they can announce they havent heard of it. Serious readers call movies cinema and refuse to see anything shown in a commercial movie house. Serious readers loathe musical theatre and think the eight hour production of Gatz on stage in London right now leaves too much of the good stuff out. Serious readers think youre an idiot. Im supposed to be a serious reader; I have been trained to be one. I went to school for an absurd number of years and spent most of them being paid to read. From September 2007 to August 2008, my only job was to read 300 books.  All of them very weighty, serious, grown-up, literary books. Or theories about such books. Then I spent the subsequent two years writing about books, at the end of which I stood in a little room and pontificated about books to other people who took books very, very seriously indeed. Then I took a job teaching other people to read and write about books. (BTW, I am dr b on Book Riot mostly because there was already another Brenna here, which, PS, kind of blew my mind, and because this nickname was bestowed upon me by a student and I find it delightful.) Its a pretty privileged existence, man. And somewhere in that process, I grew suspicious of serious readers. It started off early in grad school, when I was too new and young and idealistic to know I was supposed to lie to people. In breaks between classes, someone would ask what people were reading for fun, and I would launch into an excited discussion of Marvels Runaways  series or the Civil War  storyline. And then the serious readers at the table would stare at me, blink very slowly, and explain that their light reading this week was some of Foucaults early essays. And I would stare back at them, very confused as to what fun and Foucault had in common beyond phonetics, and feel like an idiot. I realized along the way that to be a serious reader in the way those people are serious readers, you have to fundamentally believe that some books are more worthy. You have to believe that the concept of a universal canon is worthwhile (Im much more interested in individual, personal canons). You have to believe art needs gatekeepers. And thats fine, if you do. More power to you! But I dont. And realizing that was the nexus of why I couldnt hang with the serious reader set. It also helped me realize that, as a newly-minted UnSerious Reader, my real interest is in story and community. To wit: I want to read whatever is super popular so that I can talk to people about it. Im not super interested in reading something no one else has read because I wont be able to talk about it. Unless I super super love it and I can talk other people into reading it immediately after. The best part about teaching is making people read stuff so we can talk about it together. Im much less interested than I feel like I should be, professionally, in what is good and bad literature. I dont care what shape my story comes in. It can be an ebook or a dusty tome or a tattered paperback or an unsolicited PDF. It can be a fantasy or a romance or a YA novel or a graphic text. It can be fiction or non-fiction or somewhere-in-between-fiction. If the story is good, I will engage. For that matter, it can be a TV show, a movie, a comic book, or a video game and I will engage that, too. If you want to sell me on a book, tell me what it meant to you, how it shaped you, and why the story grabbed you. Talk to me of cultural impact. Tell me how you were gripped for hours, days. Dont tell me its important unless you can tell me why in real terms. Dont tell me I should read something, unless you follow it immediately with BECAUSE YOULL LOVE IT!! This, I think, is my philosophy of reading. Which is why I was so surprised and confused last week when, in the comments of my silly 50 Shades of Grey  flowchart, a commenter wrote that she felt my post was a dig at people that dont read the right books. Heres my deep, dark, terrible, doctorate-revocation-inducing confession: I dont think there are right books. Or wrong books. I just think there are books. And I feel really, really lucky that my work and non-work time is wholly devoted to exploring books even if I do it as an UnSerious Reader, indeed.

I Was Born And Raised In Pakistan To A Muslim Family So

I was born and raised in Pakistan to a Muslim family so I practice Islam and a strong believer of my religion. I grew up almost half of life living in Pakistan. Just seven years ago my family migrated to United States to achieve the American dream. Coming to the states and adapting to the new world was definitely challenging for my family and I. Not to mention the cultural shock we went through along with the language barrier. Even though as time has passed and we have adapted to this new culture my father makes sure that his children have close ties to the Pakistani culture and the traditions. Let me first start off with the good elements of my culture which I believe is beneficial to my health. Let me start with what we eat. In my†¦show more content†¦The diet plan we follow is full of fiber, proteins, healthy carbohydrates and full of energy. Also, we use spices like turmeric, cardamom, coriander, ginger powder, cumin to flavor up food. These spices not only add flavor to our food but also act as barrier to illnesses. For example, turmeric is anti-inflammatory and antioxidant. My mom has always given us milk with a pinch of turmeric in it because she says it makes bones stronger and heals your body. I had always doubted her but few years ago I did my research and it came out turmeric is really good health. There are many factors and elements in my culture which are bad for our health and we just simply ignore them. For example, even though our food is healthy but they are way too much oily. Whenever my mom cook curry, any vegetable I tell her jokingly oh! look that okra is swimming in oil. And she replies food does not taste good without that much oil. Secondly, In Pakistan, the consumption of sugar is very high. For example, after each meal there is something sweet served such as mithai, which is dipped in sugar syrup. Without a sweet dish our meal is not complete. Also, we would rather drink sherbet, which is a sweetened fruit juice instead of water. Neither, do we have a culture for working out. After coming to America we have adapted the American way for instance, we now use vacuum cleaner to clean our house, a mop toShow MoreRelatedFollowers Of Christ Under Islamic Law1711 Words   |  7 Pagesstraight path† is the Islamic Laws drafted up by muslim scholars, much of the doc ument being taken from the Koran itself, along with the hadith.Sharia Law includes guidelines for family law, penal law, and everything in between. According to â€Å"World Geography: Understanding a Changing World† â€Å"Sharia Law is the Islamic code of laws, drawn up by muslim scholars after the Prophet Muhammad to provide muslims with a practice guide to daily life. All muslims are expected to lead their lives according to ShariaRead MoreCultural Reflection : Cultural Continued Reflection1073 Words   |  5 Pagesmean? I was born and raised in Pakistan and moved to the U.S. in August 2013, for my Master of Divinity program at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary, IL. I was born into a Pakistani (Punjabi) Christian Anglican family, which makes me a Gentile. This is because my ancestral background is not connected, directly or indirectly with Abraham or King David, but with the Aryans who once inhabited the sub-continent as cannibals and heathen-worshippers of the Sun, Moon, sea and music. I have beenRead Morean analysis of my cultural experience1698 Words   |  7 Pagesage of eleven years old was and exiting and yet intimidating experience. High buildings, wide roads, newer and nicer cars on the streets were some of the first things I noticed when I arrived to the city of Los Angeles CA. Living in a country where you were not born in could be difficult some times. Although Spanish is spoken at a grand scale in CA, it was difficult to communicate with and understand the teachers from my classes at the elementary level since all they spoke was English. Los Angeles isRead More Unique Cultures in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things and Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart2008 Words   |  9 PagesUnique Cultures in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things and Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart       There are a variety of cultures in this world and each culture is unique. Usually when one was born and raised in a certain culture, that person may adapt to that culture for a period of time. It is sometimes difficult to look into someone else’s culture, and understand their culture. Sometimes one must keep an open mind, study the culture, or live in another culture to understand the cultureRead MoreMy Opinion On The I m Malala1945 Words   |  8 PagesSince the first time that I looked through the syllabus I knew that I had two books in my mind that I wanted to read: â€Å"I’m Malala† and â€Å"Trafficked.† However, I already knew Malala, not her entire story or the obstacles she had to overcome, but I knew how brave she was. My decision to pick â€Å"I’m Malala† was based on my curiosity to understand Malala’s story and my admiration for her. I wanted to understand how, when, and why she was shot for fighting for something that in my reality seems to be a rightRead MoreGandhi is a Miracle to the Indian People Essay examples1316 Words   |  6 Pagessaved from death, but he, himself, was a miracle to the Indian people who he freed. Gandhis Life In order to better understand the miracle of Gandhi, one must learn about the man and how he became the great figure the world loves and reveres. Monhandas Gandhi was born on October 2nd, 1869. He grew up in a family of six children. He was brought up as a Hindu and his father was the chief minister of his hometownRead MoreReflection Paper On Sociology And Sociology2171 Words   |  9 PagesAs I reflect on sociology 100, I realized that this is truly a course that opens up one s mind. I admire the fact that this course really going to teach me a lot. I was really scared to take this class because honestly I had no idea what Sociology is? I never took this class but my professor made it easy and he made very clear that how we can keep an A in the class and what he expects from us. The first week of the class was just about the syllabus and what chapter we gonna cover throughout theRead MoreHistory of Pakistan18783 Words   |  76 Pages O Levelz O2 LECTURE 1- IDEOLOGY OF PAKISTAN. LECTURE 2- IDEOLOGY OF PAKISTAN IN THE LIGHT OF STATEMENTS OF QUAID-I-AZAM AND ALLAMA IQBAL LECTURE 3- THE ALIGARH MOVEMENT LECTURE 4- SIR SYED AHMAD KHAN AND HIS CONTRIBUTIONS . LECTURE 5- MAJOR POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS 1857-1918 LECTURE 6- THE KHILAFAT MOVEMENT LECTURE 7- MUSLIM POLITICS IN BRITISH INDIA: 1924-1935 LECTURE 8- ALLAMA IQBAL’S PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS DECEMBER 1930 LECTURE 9- MUSLIM POLITICS AND CHAUDHRY RAHMAT ALI LECTURERead MoreChange Versus Tradition Throughout The First Party And The Cobbler, The Machine By Mulk Raj Anand1537 Words   |  7 Pagesa middle ground between the two is often at the center of many stories about culture clash. This theme holds especially true in both The First Party by Attia Hosain and The Cobbler and the Machine by Mulk Raj Anand. Attia Hosain was born to a traditional Muslim family in Lucknow, India. As a child she saw herself as a rebellious child who resisted traditional restraints and the idea of arranged marriage. However, this sentiment is nowhere to be found in The First Party. The main character is a youngRead MoreThe Gender Roles1630 Words   |  7 Pagesfor each gender. From the day we are born, we are led and pushed towards what the normal female or male does on a daily life. Gender roles have always existed even before history was written. The roles in gender is always going to shift whether the female has more power than the male. Though in many ancient societies men have been more dominant then the female. Gender roles are not defined, but are impressed upon us by family, and the culture in which we are raised in. Gender roles is understood as

Coulombs Law Definition in Science

Coulombs law is a physical  law stating the force between two charges is proportional to the amount of charge on both charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. The law is also known as Coulombs inverse square law. Coulombs Law Equation The formula for Coulomb law is used to express the force through which stationary charged particles attract or repel one another. The force is attractive if the charges attract each other (have opposite signs) or repulsive if the charges have like signs. The scalar form of Coulombs law is:F kQ1Q2/r2 or F ∠ Q1Q2/r2wherek Coulombs constant (9.0Ãâ€"109 N m2 C−2) F force between the chargesQ1 and Q2 amount of charger distance between the two charges A vector form of the equation is also available, which may be used to indicate both the magnitude and direction of the force between the two charges. There are three requirements which must be met in order to use Coulombs law: The charges must be stationary with respect to each other.The charges must be non-overlapping.The charges must be either point charges or else otherwise spherically symmetrical in shape. History Ancient people were aware certain objects could attract or repel each other. At the time, the nature of electricity and magnetism was not understood, so the underlying principle behind magnetic attraction/repulsion versus the attraction between an amber rod and fur was thought to be the same. Scientists in the 18th century suspected the force of the attraction or repulsion diminished based on the distance between two objects. Coulombs law was published by French physicist Charles-Augustin de Coulomb in 1785. It may be used to derive Gausss law. The law is considered to be analogous to Newtons inverse square law of gravity. Sources Baigrie, Brian (2007). Electricity and Magnetism: A Historical Perspective. Greenwood Press. pp. 7–8. ISBN 978-0-313-33358-3Huray, Paul G. (2010). Maxwells Equations. Wiley. Hoboken, NJ. ISBN 0470542764.Stewart, Joseph (2001). Intermediate Electromagnetic Theory. World Scientific. p. 50. ISBN 978-981-02-4471-2

Candide in El Dorado Free Essays

The Meaning of El Dorado and its contrast with the rest of the world: El Dorado appears to be the perfect utopia, for others it represents an unrealistic place to live. For Voltaire this world meant his entire desire and dream about the perfect society. Many critics note that El Dorado is only a huge extravaganza because it consisted of contradictory statements. We will write a custom essay sample on Candide in El Dorado or any similar topic only for you Order Now The meaning of El Dorado is a vision of the perfect society and represents a false paradise impossible to attain or approach by the destructive human nature. El Dorado contrasts with the rest of the world because at the time Candide was written by Voltaire He lived in one important periods of the humanity, â€Å"The enlightenment†. Around him, he saw many injustices perpetrated by the principle institutions that lead the society at that time. The own desire of Candide to leave El Dorado was imposed by something that he knew; In El Dorado, everybody seems to be equal and a fortune in El Dorado means nothing compare to a fortune in the world where they came from. Furthermore, he needed to recover Miss Cunegonde. The superiority and the economic power that he will gain with the fortune from El Dorado will help him to get her back. Some aspects of El Dorado appear very attractive. The deistic religion that the old man describes, the obvious economic supremacy, the egalitarian practices of the king and the absence of public encounters seem to be the perfect society to emulate. El Dorado is the perfect society for Voltaire but the real thrust is that a perfect society like El Dorado is really hard to attain. The excessive exaggeration that Voltaire expresses in Candide makes some critics to think. Why if Candide always looked for the perfect world describes by his mentor Pangloss him and his servant didn’t remain in El Dorado. The answer described for many is that the Perfect Utopia lack of the reality. Shanley and Stillman point out that Voltaire makes constant use of exaggeration to suggest the excess of El Dorado: Building reach to clouds. The portal of the king’s palace is 220 feet high and 100 feet wide. Food served at the inn includes a 200-pound condor, 300 colibri hummingbirds on one platter and 600 hummingbirds on another. Such exaggerated sizes appear ludicrous; they also contrast sharply with Voltaire’s initial statement that the country is cultivated for pleasure as well as for need and that â€Å"everywhere the useful is attractive. † As we can see the exaggeration by Voltaire has no limit and in a real world probably cannot exist with such excess. The visions of El Dorado of a perfect society contrast because there are extreme inequalities. For instance, Candide and Cacambo talk to the old man, and this give them a carriage with twelve servants that indicate an exaggeration and also indicate the different social inequalities, if everybody is equal why does a man has many servant. On the other hand, the destructive human nature would never coexist in a perfect world such as El Dorado. All life beings in the nature lacks of common sense. This is evident in the nature of animals. They fight for their territory and tries to be superior in any aspect of its life. Moreover, Shanley and Stillman believe that El Dorado contains many serious defects. These defects are marked by an irrelevant economic and social inequality, material extravaganza, and stunted human emotional and intellectual capabilities. They also state it is neither a completely good society nor one that human beings can recreate elsewhere. Subsequently, El Dorado seems to be the perfect place to live despite the critics for many authors. However, El Dorado is a very straight critic to the society in which Voltaire lived. The real society in which Voltaire lived is composed for many institutions that he attacks in various opportunities such as the church and the monarchy. For example, when Candide arrived to El Dorado and he sees that all the people believe in the same thing and there’s not a priest, no hierarchy, and all the people are equal. That’s a good strike from Voltaire to the church claiming that everybody must be equal. According with Dalnekoff, â€Å"El Dorado is a foil to the societies through which Candide has passed and will pass where the inquisition imposes a reign of terror, and poverty, corruption and oppression are everywhere to be found. (Utopia and Satire)In contrast of El Dorado with the contemporary system, we found that in the contemporary system much oppression and abuses have been committed and in El Dorado the inhabitants are very virtuous; they were a society with absence of many institutions. A very questionable point in Candide and his extraordinary optimis m is why if he believes that everything obeys a divine pattern and all is for the best, why didn’t he remain in El Dorado?. Dalknekoff states that the motives given by Candide for departing are hardly worthy of commendation. His desire to be richer than all those around him is certainly deplorable. (‘Impossible dream) As Dalknekoff said, motives that move all human beings are money and the desire for superiority. Moreover, Shanley and Stillman endorse Candide; who States â€Å"If we stay here, we shall only be like others†. If they leave, they can be powerful and wealthy. They can boast of their travels, and Candide can recover Cunegonde. In accordance with the authors above Candide’s motives to leave El Dorado are typical human motives. Now beside the fact that all human beings are always seeking fortune and good position of high status, we found another important element: the love for his dear Cunegonde. The love factor is a prominent aspect that can force a human to leave a perfect society like El Dorado. El Dorado seems to be the perfect place with an extremely beauty in all aspect. Candide had an extremely urge to leave this exotic paradise because he wants to reunite with his love Miss cunengonde who was about to get married with another man. All the riches of El Dorado it wasn’t enough to attach Candide to El Dorado. On the other hand, Dalkenoff claims to stay in El Dorado would mean to escape from the evils of the real world rather than to face and deal with them. It is not in man’s imperfect nature to find happiness in such a perfect society; the best of all possible worlds is not being suites to man as he is. (Utopia and Satire) In accordance with Dalkenoff the human nature is moved by the everyday challenges and such perfection doesn’t look to be very attractive for Candide. After stayed thirty days in El Dorado Candide wants to return as soon possible to the extremely defective world outside. The Eldorado stones will only be of value to him in the defective world, where the people were stingy and greedy and they were measured by what they had. The  Stones and beauty of El Dorado oblige to encourage avarice and ambition in Candide, whose only previous idea was survive and his love for Miss Cunegonde Voltaire had an idea about the perfect society and he wanted transmit the idea to the principles institutions of his time. At the time Candide was written in 1759 Europe was in the middle of the Enlightenment period: According to Bristow The Enlightenment is the period in the history of western thought and culture, stretching roughly from the mid-decades of the seventeenth century through the eighteenth century, characterized by dramatic revolutions in science, philosophy, society and politics; these revolutions swept away the medieval world-view and ushered in our modern western world. (Bristow, par. 1) How to cite Candide in El Dorado, Essay examples

Candide in El Dorado Free Essays

The Meaning of El Dorado and its contrast with the rest of the world: El Dorado appears to be the perfect utopia, for others it represents an unrealistic place to live. For Voltaire this world meant his entire desire and dream about the perfect society. Many critics note that El Dorado is only a huge extravaganza because it consisted of contradictory statements. We will write a custom essay sample on Candide in El Dorado or any similar topic only for you Order Now The meaning of El Dorado is a vision of the perfect society and represents a false paradise impossible to attain or approach by the destructive human nature. El Dorado contrasts with the rest of the world because at the time Candide was written by Voltaire He lived in one important periods of the humanity, â€Å"The enlightenment†. Around him, he saw many injustices perpetrated by the principle institutions that lead the society at that time. The own desire of Candide to leave El Dorado was imposed by something that he knew; In El Dorado, everybody seems to be equal and a fortune in El Dorado means nothing compare to a fortune in the world where they came from. Furthermore, he needed to recover Miss Cunegonde. The superiority and the economic power that he will gain with the fortune from El Dorado will help him to get her back. Some aspects of El Dorado appear very attractive. The deistic religion that the old man describes, the obvious economic supremacy, the egalitarian practices of the king and the absence of public encounters seem to be the perfect society to emulate. El Dorado is the perfect society for Voltaire but the real thrust is that a perfect society like El Dorado is really hard to attain. The excessive exaggeration that Voltaire expresses in Candide makes some critics to think. Why if Candide always looked for the perfect world describes by his mentor Pangloss him and his servant didn’t remain in El Dorado. The answer described for many is that the Perfect Utopia lack of the reality. Shanley and Stillman point out that Voltaire makes constant use of exaggeration to suggest the excess of El Dorado: Building reach to clouds. The portal of the king’s palace is 220 feet high and 100 feet wide. Food served at the inn includes a 200-pound condor, 300 colibri hummingbirds on one platter and 600 hummingbirds on another. Such exaggerated sizes appear ludicrous; they also contrast sharply with Voltaire’s initial statement that the country is cultivated for pleasure as well as for need and that â€Å"everywhere the useful is attractive. † As we can see the exaggeration by Voltaire has no limit and in a real world probably cannot exist with such excess. The visions of El Dorado of a perfect society contrast because there are extreme inequalities. For instance, Candide and Cacambo talk to the old man, and this give them a carriage with twelve servants that indicate an exaggeration and also indicate the different social inequalities, if everybody is equal why does a man has many servant. On the other hand, the destructive human nature would never coexist in a perfect world such as El Dorado. All life beings in the nature lacks of common sense. This is evident in the nature of animals. They fight for their territory and tries to be superior in any aspect of its life. Moreover, Shanley and Stillman believe that El Dorado contains many serious defects. These defects are marked by an irrelevant economic and social inequality, material extravaganza, and stunted human emotional and intellectual capabilities. They also state it is neither a completely good society nor one that human beings can recreate elsewhere. Subsequently, El Dorado seems to be the perfect place to live despite the critics for many authors. However, El Dorado is a very straight critic to the society in which Voltaire lived. The real society in which Voltaire lived is composed for many institutions that he attacks in various opportunities such as the church and the monarchy. For example, when Candide arrived to El Dorado and he sees that all the people believe in the same thing and there’s not a priest, no hierarchy, and all the people are equal. That’s a good strike from Voltaire to the church claiming that everybody must be equal. According with Dalnekoff, â€Å"El Dorado is a foil to the societies through which Candide has passed and will pass where the inquisition imposes a reign of terror, and poverty, corruption and oppression are everywhere to be found. (Utopia and Satire)In contrast of El Dorado with the contemporary system, we found that in the contemporary system much oppression and abuses have been committed and in El Dorado the inhabitants are very virtuous; they were a society with absence of many institutions. A very questionable point in Candide and his extraordinary optimis m is why if he believes that everything obeys a divine pattern and all is for the best, why didn’t he remain in El Dorado?. Dalknekoff states that the motives given by Candide for departing are hardly worthy of commendation. His desire to be richer than all those around him is certainly deplorable. (‘Impossible dream) As Dalknekoff said, motives that move all human beings are money and the desire for superiority. Moreover, Shanley and Stillman endorse Candide; who States â€Å"If we stay here, we shall only be like others†. If they leave, they can be powerful and wealthy. They can boast of their travels, and Candide can recover Cunegonde. In accordance with the authors above Candide’s motives to leave El Dorado are typical human motives. Now beside the fact that all human beings are always seeking fortune and good position of high status, we found another important element: the love for his dear Cunegonde. The love factor is a prominent aspect that can force a human to leave a perfect society like El Dorado. El Dorado seems to be the perfect place with an extremely beauty in all aspect. Candide had an extremely urge to leave this exotic paradise because he wants to reunite with his love Miss cunengonde who was about to get married with another man. All the riches of El Dorado it wasn’t enough to attach Candide to El Dorado. On the other hand, Dalkenoff claims to stay in El Dorado would mean to escape from the evils of the real world rather than to face and deal with them. It is not in man’s imperfect nature to find happiness in such a perfect society; the best of all possible worlds is not being suites to man as he is. (Utopia and Satire) In accordance with Dalkenoff the human nature is moved by the everyday challenges and such perfection doesn’t look to be very attractive for Candide. After stayed thirty days in El Dorado Candide wants to return as soon possible to the extremely defective world outside. The Eldorado stones will only be of value to him in the defective world, where the people were stingy and greedy and they were measured by what they had. The  Stones and beauty of El Dorado oblige to encourage avarice and ambition in Candide, whose only previous idea was survive and his love for Miss Cunegonde Voltaire had an idea about the perfect society and he wanted transmit the idea to the principles institutions of his time. At the time Candide was written in 1759 Europe was in the middle of the Enlightenment period: According to Bristow The Enlightenment is the period in the history of western thought and culture, stretching roughly from the mid-decades of the seventeenth century through the eighteenth century, characterized by dramatic revolutions in science, philosophy, society and politics; these revolutions swept away the medieval world-view and ushered in our modern western world. (Bristow, par. 1) How to cite Candide in El Dorado, Essay examples